3 and After Dinner tonight (or ever!)
Who Framed
the "Franco"?
by
Alexander Gerbi
.
I lya fifty years, Africa has been released by the Fifth Republic blaciste which to destroy the "Republic of 58" of the division and played mostly ras-le-bol of African leaders, weary of contempt of State.
This release was decided, in the words of General de Gaulle, to prevent "bougnoulisation" of France, namely the Miscegenation and civilization, including religious, France. To allow, also, the continued exploitation of African territories.
At the time, basically, most of the great African leaders believed that to destroy colonialism, the best way was not independence, but equality in a large Franco-African Republic. As for metropolitan populations and ultramarine, independence, often seen as adventurous, rarely had a preference. Moreover, at the cost of a quadruple violation of the Constitution that the French government deprived African citizens the right to self-determination on the issue of independence (Act 60-525, May-June 1960). After refusing the departmentalization of Gabon in October 1958 (violation of Article 76 of the Constitution). From
This vast operation in which Paris was the real master of the game result was a new system where, logically, Paris was still the master of the game is as well as the alleged "decolonization", emerges a neo-empire, since independence skillfully imposed were essentially illusory and always eventually confiscated. For more or less short term, many fathers of independence were ousted by coups on order "metropolitan" and many of them were murdered. Thus, the former African territories, states have become "independent" to be continued in fact controlled from Paris, and more specifically since the Elysee. Not surprisingly, since that was the goal even before 1960.
networks that FX Verschave called the "Franco" managed to keep under their overall domination of the former African territories of France, the reign of Charles de Gaulle (1958-1969) to below that of Jacques Chirac (1995 - 2007). Even if the positions of France were severely challenged after the fall of the Berlin Wall (1989) and especially after the collapse of the Soviet Union (1991). From that date, the United States, hitherto generally allies and accomplices of the "Franco", became its adversaries, as the number 1 enemy, the Soviet Union had disappeared. They did not hesitate to subvert and destabilize the "backyard".
It was the 1990s which, from the Rwandan tragedy (1994), then plunged Zaire mobutien kabilien - finally remained condominium Franco-American (or Euro-American, inclusive of other "interests") - a terrible war (at least 5 million dead), who left the country desperate, despite (because of) his colossal wealth. The shock wave reached finally the Congo - Brazzaville, one of the hearts of the "Franco" and set ablaze.
In the early 2000s, the price of a new bag of knots and seas of blood, one of the shrines' French-African, Ivory Coast, toppled in a particular political chaos, it is still not released at this time.
Now where are we? Networks become Foccart Mitterrand-Pasqua successor systems of influence where we find ancient figures of the era preceding the French side as well as the African side.
Under the guise of "decolonization", in reality against the backdrop of colonialism, the former French Africa has never been independent, and everyone knows it is hardly more so today, despite the statements of French state and its "friends" of Africa. Despite, too, battering and other penetrations rival if not hostile.
Currently, the "Franco", although qu'attaquée, is still largely standing, if not directed from Paris, at least with their help and support.
What should I do?
At the option of a of those ironies that should meditate, today we see many Africans, particularly among the most Westernized (or Anglicized ...) among them, advocate the independence of their country, calling for major the screams from France. In other words, they claim that the project is accomplished, among other official enemies of Africa, the state and neo-Gaullist Gaullist door and falsely glorifies the past fifty years.
Africans who sold their brothers as slaves to Europeans or Arabs, then collaborated with colonialism, neocolonialism finally served (this they often went on well) realize now the importance they have today to advocate the "independence". This allows to discard a good account of its responsibilities on the single "Franco" to rebuild under a brand new Patriot sensitive to the misery of the people, and ultimately meet the sirens that they require no account terms of respect for human rights and democracy. And that greasy paws in the secrecy of course, when the French have less room to maneuver on these sections and are, above all, increasingly discredited ...
In such circumstances, is it any wonder that the little people of Africa beginning to suspect a new trick, when some of their elites announce their new tomorrows, without hesitating to use the same "word magic "than before? For the little people know that the disaster of neocolonialism accomplished, throughout its history, with wonderful names, and turn over the decades of "independence" and "cooperation" of "authenticity" "democracy" and "good governance", and again now, to " independence ": the circle is complete ...
So often the little people in Africa, even today, more willing to opt for integration Franco-African and Euro-African, in a strictly egalitarian, democratic and socially just as he hoped, in vain , fifty years ago. With these new adventurous promises of "independence" of its Westernized elites, he would prefer integration with France (and the integration of France in his country ...) in a finally egalitarian and fraternal.
Is it any wonder that such a choice, true preferences of most African political leaders of the 1950s and their people, nowadays finds an echo among the common people of Africa with more force than it has escaped the Westernization and rhetoric the Fifth Republic, his peers and his vassals?
And is it any wonder that most French of Africans, those elites who are most often span several continents and live a lifestyle completely French or Western, promoting a project totally opposite of fits him with the slogans which have prevailed for fifty years the French state and the rest of the world?
To stop the massacre, would remain in the French political class, both right and left, extreme right and extreme left, stop lying, and admit what happened, fifty years ago . To be able to listen, finally, what Africa wants its depths, especially one that suffers.
It remains, however, the Africans for daring to speak, to remember history and to let their heart, without fearing the wrath and vengeance of the universe.
But there is far from the cup and the lip, when the political class metropolitan has been so long employed to undermine the Franco-African unity shots transvestite history and amnesia (to herself, memory loss), and that the system is then imperative that muzzles or cursed Africans who do not work in the nails.
Alexander Gerbi
0 comments:
Post a Comment